An objection to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal may be raised by the respondent no later than in the response to the statement of claim, unless another time limit was agreed by the parties. The party may raise the objection later if it did not know and could not have known of the grounds for objection or if the grounds appeared later.
The right to raise an objection is not excluded by the fact that a party has appointed or participated in the appointment of an arbitrator.
An objection that the arbitral tribunal is exceeding the scope of its authority should be raised as soon as the matter alleged to be beyond the scope of its authority is raised during the proceedings.
In any case, the arbitral tribunal may admit a later objection if it considers the delay justified.
It often happens that the plans for a project are modified after a decision on environmental conditions is issued but before issuance of a permit for the project itself (e.g. the building permit). Is it necessary to amend the environmental decision?
read furtherWhen a company has been issued an environmental permit, e.g. to release particles into the atmosphere, may it freely assign its rights under the permit?
read furtherInterest in arbitration is growing, due to its effectiveness, professionalism, confidentiality and speed—particularly important benefits for businesses. But the parties do not always take full advantage of the possibilities.
read further